Should we judge presidents by their words or by their deeds?

Deeds

1 of 4

by Ann Caimen

Write now Print Invite a writer™ Add to Favorites RSS Feed Contact this writer

Anyone can stand behind a podium and make promises. Anyone can claim they will be the best leader in history if given the chance, and almost anyone can convince people to follow them with a few simple promises or statements. I have even done this on occasion.

A person cannot really be judged only by their actions or only by their words. Both are important. It tells you a lot about a person's character if the things they say and the things they do are different. Their actions, however, are the most important.

Throughout the years, we've seen hypocrisy and broken promises cross the political stage many times. Sometimes it's shocking and sometimes it's sadly predictable. Hypocrisy is something the American people have become too used to, and I think we've begun to forgive it or forget it too easily. A person who wants to lead the country needs to be held to higher standards than the rest of us. It is amazing to me how some people will blindly follow a political leader even after they have been caught in lies numerous times. Lies are unacceptable. Good deeds and intentions are a necessity.

I judge people first and foremost by what they live by, what they truly believe. On some issues it doesn't really matter whether or not I agree with the person, but on some it is extremely important. It is so frustrating when I see a political candidate who doesn't care for or respect the fundamental freedoms every American enjoys everyday, and is cheered on by millions when giving a speech about how horrible Americans are and how they need to change the things they value the most. I am more likely to support someone who actually appreciates the freedom and the values of America, and wants to lead this country with a positive attitude and a passion for what America represents.

The second most important characteristic in my view is association. Who does this person support? Many people tell me it's all about what they candidate believes and not who they spend time with. I don't really care who a candidate is friends with, but support is something different. Support can be attending rallies, offering money, attending church with, and learning from a person, and in this case I'm talking about a person of questionable character. Every once in a while, a political leader is questioned about their association with someone who broke the law or expresses views that are against the candidates beliefs. Some think these interrogations are unnecessary, but I think they are very appropriate. If a candidate says they value American freedom, but spends the weekends golfing with a dictator I think it should be pointed out. Who you throw your support behind says a lot about who you are and what you believe. I don't think it's any different for political leaders.

Lastly, good deeds should be measured, even if they are just for show or done only to impress the public. For whatever reason a good act is done, it is still a good act. It is important to me to know that political leaders do not only think of themselves. I want to know that the person is capable of acting with compassion, thoughtfulness, and showing respect where it is deserved.

Words can be easily said, remembered or forgotten, strong or weak. But words are nothing without the actions behind them. Complaining about a problem doesn't solve it. Action does.

Learn more about this author, Ann Caimen.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.